An executor document request is easy to send and hard to track. The first message lists eight items, three arrive in different formats, one is the wrong year, and two never arrive at all. Weeks later the attorney asks for the file and nobody can say which version is current.

The administrative fix is a request register. It does not interpret the documents or decide what the estate should do. It records what was asked, what arrived, what is still open, and who owns the next step.

Start From the Authorized Request

Build the register from the list the supervising attorney, paralegal, or executor has approved. Do not create requirements from general practice or from a prior matter. Each row should trace to the request that authorized it, whether that is an email, a checklist, or a court form.

Where the request is verbal, write it down and confirm it in a short message. A register built on recollection will conflict with the file the first time someone checks.

Record the Minimum Useful Fields

For each item, record the document name, the period or date range, the person or institution expected to provide it, the format required, and the due date. Add the status, the date received, the reviewer, and the location in the approved system.

Keep the identity of the source separate from the content of the document. A bank statement provided by the executor and one received directly from the institution are not the same evidence, even when the numbers match.

Separate Received From Accepted

A document can arrive and still be unusable. Mark it received when it lands, then mark it accepted only when the authorized reviewer confirms it is the right document, for the right period, in a legible form. This distinction prevents a tidy-looking register from hiding a file that cannot be reviewed.

Where a document is rejected, record the reason in plain terms: wrong year, missing pages, unsigned, unreadable scan, or not the requested record. Then issue a specific follow-up.

Keep the Follow-Up Cadence Visible

Each open item needs a next date and an owner. A weekly review is usually enough for routine estate administration, provided the review looks at the age of each item rather than only its status.

When an item is waiting on a third party, record the date of the last contact and the next attempt. When it is waiting on the family, record who was asked and how. "Waiting" without an owner is how requests disappear.

Protect Sensitive Material

Estate files include identity documents, account numbers, medical records, and family correspondence. Use the approved secure location, restrict access by role, and avoid attaching full documents to general email threads. A register should reference the record, not reproduce it.

If a document arrives through the wrong channel, move it, record the move, and remove unnecessary copies.

Handle the Common Exceptions

**The document does not exist.** Record the search performed and the response from the institution. A documented absence is different from an unanswered request.

**The family provides a summary instead of the source.** Accept it as correspondence, not as the requested record, and keep the request open.

**A deadline is approaching.** Escalate early with the specific missing items. Do not wait until the day before to report a gap.

Hand Off With a Clean Status

When the file moves to another coordinator or to the attorney, the register should answer five questions without a meeting: what was requested, what is present, what is missing, what is disputed, and what happens next. A short status column is more useful than a long narrative.

Review the Register Itself

Once a month, sample five closed items and confirm the document is where the register says it is. Check that accepted items were actually reviewed and that rejected items have a follow-up. This catches the slow drift that turns a register into a wish list.

Executor support is mostly disciplined follow-up. When the request, the receipt, the review, and the next action live in one record, the estate moves faster and the attorney spends time on judgment instead of reconstruction.